Toronto Photography Meetup Group

TPMG.CA
It is currently Wed Oct 22, 2025 9:50 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Schmap & flickr
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:52 am 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:50 pm
Posts: 8965
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 25 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/lxdesign
Hi guys,

I just got a most disturbing message...

"Hi David,

I am writing to let you know that one of your photos has
been short-listed for inclusion in the second edition of
our Schmap Canada Guide, to be published at the end of this
month.

(LINK PROVIDED SHOWING PHOTO AS APPEARING IN SITE)

Clicking this link will take you to a page where you can:
i) See which of your photos has been short-listed.
ii) Submit or withdraw your photo from our final selection
phase.
iii) Learn how we credit photos in our Schmap Guides.
iv) Browse the first edition of our Schmap Canada Guide.

While we offer no payment for publication, many
photographers are pleased to submit their photos, as Schmap
Guides give their work recognition and wide exposure, and
are free of charge to readers. Photos are published at a
maximum width of 150 pixels, are clearly attributed, and
link to high-resolution originals at Flickr.

Our submission deadline is Sunday, March 9. If you happen
to be reading this message after this date, please still
click on the link above (our Schmap Guides are updated
frequently - photos submitted after this deadline will be
considered for later releases).

Best regards,

Emma Williams,
Managing Editor, Schmap Guides"


Has anyone gotten a message from these people? I am seriously thinking of withdrawing my photo.... (Flatiron Building).. for two reasons... #1 - there is no financial compensation for use of my photo in a published guide, and #2 - I don't appreciate people just pulling my photos off of flickr and then asking me 'after' the fact. Now I know that my work is stolen all the time, and that is a risk I take making my images available on the world wide web... but when it comes to a publisher, I am not a happy camper. So do you think I am doing the right thing? Or just over-reacting?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:56 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:13 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://flickr.com/samobeid
I've had a few from them. Just decline it and move on!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:10 pm 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:50 pm
Posts: 8965
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 25 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/lxdesign
ya, that's what I was going to do.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:20 pm 
Offline
TPMG ADDICT

Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:07 pm
Posts: 1787
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Same here, I declined.

xref here : http://tpmg.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?p=52 ... ght=#52962


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Schmap & flickr
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:54 am
Posts: 559
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
lxdesign wrote:
Has anyone gotten a message from these people? I am seriously thinking of withdrawing my photo.... (Flatiron Building).. for two reasons... #1 - there is no financial compensation for use of my photo in a published guide, and #2 - I don't appreciate people just pulling my photos off of flickr and then asking me 'after' the fact. Now I know that my work is stolen all the time, and that is a risk I take making my images available on the world wide web... but when it comes to a publisher, I am not a happy camper. So do you think I am doing the right thing? Or just over-reacting?


#1 but not everyone is in for it for financial gain. I think it's a great opportunity to build one's portfolio if you are an amateur and have had no exposure yet.

#2 But doesn't it say that you have to either approve or decline?
I don't think they will publish it until you approve. Wasn't the link that showed your picture on their site just a mock-up?

I've had my work published (both online and printed) a couple of times with no financial gain (but full credit). Of course it would be great to be paid but I still consider myself an amateur. I will eventually release my work only for payment...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 11:33 pm
Posts: 662
Location: Toronto, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I don't blame you if this rubs you the wrong way. The way they word their message makes it look like they're doing you a favour, not the other way around (IMHO). They could at least say "Please".


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:45 pm 
Offline
TPMG ADDICT

Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:07 pm
Posts: 1787
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
If you check out their website, pictures that are "selected" by them to be posted are obviously not based on artistic quality. So I am not sure how much recognition they are giving you.

I was tempted at first to let them use my picture but at the end I declined.
I surely hope they didn't use my picture anyways. Maybe I should go and check :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Schmap & flickr
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:29 pm 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:50 pm
Posts: 8965
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 25 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/lxdesign
Xerox wrote:
not everyone is in for it for financial gain.


I've done enough freebies .. its time to start making some coin!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:30 pm 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:50 pm
Posts: 8965
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 25 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/lxdesign
I declined the request. I agree John -- they do word it as if they are doing me a favor...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Schmap & flickr
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:35 pm 
Xerox wrote:
#1 but not everyone is in for it for financial gain. I think it's a great opportunity to build one's portfolio if you are an amateur and have had no exposure yet.


I think building a portfolio using Schmap will lead to a dead end.

The way I see it, maybe from a marketing perspective, is that people who travel would be using Schmap possibly. So that's the market that Schmap is going after. Considering this, do you really think a lot of people here would be looking at the photographer of these photos? Probably not. And artistic value isn't one of their key requirements as WKHC mentioned.

But for one that declines these requests, there's probably ten other people that are glad to provide their photo to them for nothing.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:10 pm 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:15 pm
Posts: 1192
Location: Toronto, Canada
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/pebbz
I got one today. It was a picture of a broom hanging on a wall at pioneer village. Not very artistic compared to my shots now. I figure they are just tourist industry and looking for shots of the area. I declined.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Schmap & flickr
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:54 am
Posts: 559
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Tanner wrote:
Xerox wrote:
#1 but not everyone is in for it for financial gain. I think it's a great opportunity to build one's portfolio if you are an amateur and have had no exposure yet.


I think building a portfolio using Schmap will lead to a dead end.



Sorry I was unclear. I was thinking more in general - not specifically to Schmap (since I have not heard of Schmap before).
But I agree. The organization using your work matters.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 191
Location: Markham
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I received one today as well. Not to mention I declined too.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Near Downtown Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Got one too - they seem to be on a spamming spree...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 12:45 pm
Posts: 218
Location: Hamilton
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I got the same email. I did some research on them and they seem to be legit and no negative comments anywhere. It seems they must have gone through TPMG Flickr group and picked the photos they wanted.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:54 am
Posts: 559
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I was feeling left out seeing that many others got a notice from schmaps. I just checked my email and got one too.
.... declining....

TPMG selling the list of member's flickr to companies??? lol J/K.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:39 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:29 am
Posts: 3415
Location: James in RH
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/cahhK
I got one the other day .. I can't see the harm in it for me personally so I will let them use it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 12:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 661
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Hahaha I must be lacking since I didn't get an invite. Schmap did ask for permission last year for a photo I took a long time ago and I thought it was kind of nice. I was still in the beginning stages and thought it quite flattering to be asked. Like Seren Dipity, I didn't see any harm in it so I gave them permission.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:53 am
Posts: 40
Location: Richmond Hill
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I think what it comes down to is another company making money off the backs of other people. They get free images for their website, even allow people to print them. Yet with all the advertising, and pay per click money they will get will become rich, and the people that made it like that, the photographers will get nothing. Most Photographers who make a living from their business would not give them a photo of theirs. If you make a living from something you probably would not give it away for free, doctors, lawyers, mechanics, plumbers, electricians, nobody gives work away for free, unless its for charity. It appears that photography is being devalued everyday to the point that it will be worthless. Sure anyone can take a photograph of a building, just like any artist can paint it, but an artist would not give away a painting for free, if so they would starve, so why should we as photographers give away our art for free. I agree they are giving you advertising, maybe thats a worthwile exchange, but how many people are looking to buy photography on a map site I ask you. Sorry if I offended anyone. I think the site is a great idea for travellers, but at least pay something for it per click on the photo to the photographer.

P.S. if you want it hust for the link to your website or flickr, or give you more clicks, then it may just fit the bill for some people.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:13 am 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:29 am
Posts: 3415
Location: James in RH
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/cahhK
rhommel wrote:
Seren Dipity wrote:
I got one the other day .. I can't see the harm in it for me personally so I will let them use it.


Also got the message and I also let them use my photo of the Old City Hall... http://www.flickr.com/photos/rhommel/344884192/

They messaged me again last night telling me it's up on their site (published[?])

http://www.schmap.com/canada/attraction ... 542_10.jpg


I got the email too saying it's on their site. Even though it's mainly for their benefit it's still pretty cool.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:53 am
Posts: 40
Location: Richmond Hill
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I understand your point, ther is no harm done to you, it gives you exposure, and they used a photo of yours. I am not attacking you, I am attacking the website. if they get away with getting photos for free, then then next website will want them for free, it is a domino effect. It overall devalues phootgraphy as an art form. We as photographers need to stand together and say no to this kind of business practice.

N.B. True not everything is about money, I offer many of my services to charities, and will do Pro Bono work for them, I even offer services to local groups that cannot afford photography services, or people that are of low or no income.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:21 am
Posts: 109
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
rhommel wrote:
i consider my photo of the old city hall as a 'snapshot'... it was taken 1 month (January 2007) after i bought my first ever dslr. i didnt know how to use my dslr then but i did know how to set up a tripod...

no offense too... but not everything is about money. i am happy with the fact that somebody used my 'SNAPSHOT' on their website. so what if they make money, no harm done to me...



The Problem I have with this bottom statement is, that there is no harm to you, but it's taking money and food off the plate of the Pro who would sell his images to make ends meat. The digital camera is killing the professional photography industry.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:03 pm 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:13 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://flickr.com/samobeid
Video Killed The Radio Star :roll:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:10 am
Posts: 70
Location: Newmarket, Ontario
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
this is so ridiculous, a business build on begging for freebies when the stock has billions of good quality pictures. cheep too.
yep, that is less money for the photogs who decide to honestly sell their images through stock agencies.
exposure :shock: what exposure? what tourists will look at the guide and smack their heads in awe looking at your amateur picture, saying: I want to buy this image now :lol:
IMHO don't give them anything; if they steal there is a law for it...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:21 am
Posts: 109
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
SamObeid wrote:
Video Killed The Radio Star :roll:


So let's put it this way, lets take industry you work in for instance (whatever that maybe) and some other company started doing the work for free and handing it out like candy how are you suppose to compete with that? How would you and or your company like to be under cut like that? How would that company be looked upon in the industry?

Just because people take pictures doesn't mean their business is any less important. Professional photography is a dying art because everyone with a digital camera can easly obtain reasonable results now days.

I think we were better off with film as an industry, hobbiest were hobbiest and pros were pros, the line wasn't as blurred as it is today. Imho


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:27 pm 
It's still a bit more than just ...

"Professional photography is a dying art because everyone with a digital camera can easly obtain reasonable results now days."

Anybody can take a DSLR, throw it in the green mode and take decent pictures. With respect to the pros, you still need to have a great eye to get great photos. And hopefully these realize that they do have a skill (whether natural or years of effort) and don't simply give photos away for free. For non-profit organizations I can understand.

The problem with the digital age, no matter what it is, it's forcing the ones that are doing this for a living, rethinking about their service and finding new ways to be competitive out there vs the amateurs.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:25 pm
Posts: 244
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Hello. I am going to nitpick, but only for discussion sake:

It's not the dslr phenomena causing this, it is the popularity of cheap or free hosting and social sites making plethora of images consumable with minimal effort. In the olden days, there were tons of film photographers, but their output was not publicly consumable.

And to me that's the conundrum: we use the social sites for obvious reasons, but, assuming here, also probably some people use them with the raison d'etre, no matter how small, to be seen, discovered.

To deflect my own argument, perhaps some use them as a teaser, to draw attention to more serious or accomplished work, indeed for sale. But really how many, or is that argument too specious?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:54 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:29 am
Posts: 3415
Location: James in RH
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/cahhK
Well after reading this thread a few times and mulling over the topic in my head I have to say that you guys have swayed me. You are right, as photographers we should not be giving our photos away for free to businesses who are making a profit off of it. I agree that it ultimately de-values our work as photographers and makes it harder for professional photographers to make a living.

So from now on I will not be giving away my photos for free unless it is for a charitable cause or something similar.

James


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:20 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:13 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://flickr.com/samobeid
Want to be a successful photographer? Go to business school not photography school.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:29 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:13 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://flickr.com/samobeid
What's that saying "adapt or die"?

Want to be a successful photographer? Go to business school not photography school. Work on your business and don't worry about digital cameras or Schmap.

If you haven't already do a search and watch the Chase Jarvis video where he speaks in NYC.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group