Toronto Photography Meetup Group

TPMG.CA
It is currently Tue Oct 21, 2025 10:02 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Photography Forums » Photography in General

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 3
  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
sliua
 Post subject: Post your voyeur photos!
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:08 am
Posts: 368
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Image
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PotatoEYE
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:34 am 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
what is voyeur? :oops:
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
axiom
 Post subject: let me post it again
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:50 am
Posts: 201
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/axio/3700403786/" title="Pricelessly caught by &#26494;&#26519;&#65324;, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3655/3700403786_3971afac76_b.jpg" width="1024" height="682" alt="Pricelessly caught"></a>
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
axiom
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:50 am
Posts: 201
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
to sliua

that looks like a Cityplace building
maybe we live close..
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
lxdesign
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:32 am 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:50 pm
Posts: 8965
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 25 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/lxdesign
ok, this post is just creepy....
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Burlap Jacket
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:21 pm
Posts: 773
Location: Downtown Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/burlapjacket/2562527581/" title="voyeur by Burlap Jacket, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3135/2562527581_a71dc2d708.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="voyeur"></a>
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
sh3r0y
 Post subject: Re: let me post it again
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:02 pm
Posts: 79
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
axiom wrote:
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/axio/3700403786/" title="Pricelessly caught by &#26494;&#26519;&#65324;, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3655/3700403786_3971afac76_b.jpg" width="1024" height="682" alt="Pricelessly caught"></a>


ROFL!!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
dasrocket
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:31 pm
Posts: 242
Location: gta
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
So, this is what all the 80-200 IS lenses get bought for :D ...
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
bhrm
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:04 pm
Posts: 853
Location: Markham
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
dasrocket wrote:
So, this is what all the 80-200 IS lenses get bought for :D ...


Wrong.

A Bigma is required.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
axiom
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:50 am
Posts: 201
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
dasrocket wrote:
So, this is what all the 80-200 IS lenses get bought for :D ...


Wrong!
Noctilux was used
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Paul_Dunlop
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:34 pm
Posts: 73
Location: Mississauga, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
for me, outdoor shots are mostly ok

through a window - not so much
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
sliua
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:08 am
Posts: 368
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Where's the noctilux swirly bokeh?
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
holly
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:09 pm
Posts: 192
Location: Peterborough, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Paul_Dunlop wrote:
for me, outdoor shots are mostly ok

through a window - not so much


Yeah, definitely agreed. I also think it's illegal. I would feel extremely violated were I to discover someone had been photographing me in my own personal space without my consent.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Seren Dipity
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:01 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:29 am
Posts: 3415
Location: James in RH
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/cahhK
holly wrote:
Paul_Dunlop wrote:
for me, outdoor shots are mostly ok

through a window - not so much


Yeah, definitely agreed. I also think it's illegal. I would feel extremely violated were I to discover someone had been photographing me in my own personal space without my consent.


+1
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Seren Dipity
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:02 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:29 am
Posts: 3415
Location: James in RH
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/cahhK
Very illegal.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
imageone
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:39 pm 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:19 am
Posts: 1106
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Seren Dipity wrote:
Very illegal.


I wonder how TMZ always gets away with it?
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
smlg.ca
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:56 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 8:55 am
Posts: 1200
Location: Mississauga
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
They probably get sued on a daily basis and just settle.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
pebbz
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:39 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:15 pm
Posts: 1192
Location: Toronto, Canada
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/pebbz
Seren Dipity wrote:
Very illegal.


This is why I live in a dark dungeon. My curtains are always drawn closed.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
philmar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:19 am 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:24 pm
Posts: 3379
Location: Yonge-Davisvillish - T.O.
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
imageone wrote:
Seren Dipity wrote:
Very illegal.


I wonder how TMZ always gets away with it?


I don't know about Canada, but my understanding is that the paparazzi in the US are allowed to photograph inside of private property so long as they are standing on public property at the time.
That means you are not protected by the law from being photographed in your house.

That is why Google can drive vehicles around with cities with a video camera that points to the insides of people's houses (Google street view)
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Metrix
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:05 pm 
Offline
Official TPMG Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4691
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 19 times
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/metrix_feet/
[quote]

The relevant section of the criminal code reads:

Criminal Code

PART V: SEXUAL OFFENCES, PUBLIC MORALS AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT

Sexual Offences

Voyeurism

162. (1) Every one commits an offence who, surreptitiously, observes
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
axiom
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:50 am
Posts: 201
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
omg
did I violate any law for taking this picture?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/axio/3700403786/" title="Pricelessly caught by &#26494;&#26519;&#65324;, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3655/3700403786_3971afac76_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Pricelessly caught"></a>


I don't know what kind of privacy the couple expected though...
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
lxdesign
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:54 pm 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:50 pm
Posts: 8965
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 25 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/lxdesign
axiom wrote:
omg
did I violate any law for taking this picture?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/axio/3700403786/" title="Pricelessly caught by &#26494;&#26519;&#65324;, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3655/3700403786_3971afac76_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Pricelessly caught"></a>


I don't know what kind of privacy the couple expected though...



No you didn't --- as they were in a public place - how could they be in "circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy"

So I don't believe that you did anything illegal. If anything - they are the one's who did for committing an indecent act in public.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
lxdesign
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:55 pm 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:50 pm
Posts: 8965
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 25 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/lxdesign
Oh ya, still doesn't change the fact that I think this thread is just creepy!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Paul_Dunlop
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:34 pm
Posts: 73
Location: Mississauga, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
axiom wrote:
omg
did I violate any law for taking this picture?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/axio/3700403786/" title="Pricelessly caught by &#26494;&#26519;&#65324;, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3655/3700403786_3971afac76_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Pricelessly caught"></a>


I don't know what kind of privacy the couple expected though...


I don't think so - they gave up / had no expectation of privacy
And if cops had been around, THEY would have been arrested, not you
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Kin Lau
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:10 pm 
Offline
TPMG ADDICT

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 1793
Location: Scarberia
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
lxdesign wrote:
Oh ya, still doesn't change the fact that I think this thread is just creepy!


I'm surprised this thread hasn't been deleted yet.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PotatoEYE
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:13 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
lxdesign wrote:
axiom wrote:
omg
did I violate any law for taking this picture?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/axio/3700403786/" title="Pricelessly caught by &#26494;&#26519;&#65324;, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3655/3700403786_3971afac76_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Pricelessly caught"></a>


I don't know what kind of privacy the couple expected though...



No you didn't --- as they were in a public place - how could they be in "circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy"

So I don't believe that you did anything illegal. If anything - they are the one's who did for committing an indecent act in public.


Looks pretty decent to me :lol:
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Peter Kozikowski
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 9:43 am
Posts: 801
Location: Newmarket
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Kin Lau wrote:
lxdesign wrote:
Oh ya, still doesn't change the fact that I think this thread is just creepy!


I'm surprised this thread hasn't been deleted yet.


Why do you think it should be deleted? Creepy or not, or invading privacy, the images ( the 2 showing poeple indoors ) don't show poeple in compromising positions. I am not saying that I am a big fan of it, but some of the best photographers on the planet do it as well.

http://www.magnumphotos.com/Archive/C.a ... &CT=Search
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Kin Lau
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:43 pm 
Offline
TPMG ADDICT

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 1793
Location: Scarberia
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Voyeurism is a criminal activity by definition - regardless whether the above pictures meet the requirement or not, encouraging or allowing criminal activity on a board like this is not a good idea.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Peter Kozikowski
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 9:43 am
Posts: 801
Location: Newmarket
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Kin Lau wrote:
Voyeurism is a criminal activity by definition - regardless whether the above pictures meet the requirement or not, encouraging or allowing criminal activity on a board like this is not a good idea.


To say that this thread is criminal activity, or even encouragment of such is really a stretch ;-)
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Kin Lau
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:03 pm 
Offline
TPMG ADDICT

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 1793
Location: Scarberia
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
whatever you say....
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 3
  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » Photography Forums » Photography in General

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group