Toronto Photography Meetup Group

TPMG.CA
It is currently Thu Oct 23, 2025 1:41 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Photography Forums » Gear and Equipment

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 13 posts ] 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Carlton
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:44 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 2119
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 1 time
Looks like Tamron has finally entered into the race for fast focusing with their new USD (Ultrasonic Silent Drive) system.

http://tamron.com/news/35mm/70300vc_60th_2010.asp
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PotatoEYE
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:53 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
Funny abbreviation they are using :lol:
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
ottodc6
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:43 pm
Posts: 24
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Can we please have that on the 17-50? :roll:
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
chopper
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm 
Offline
TPMG ADDICT
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:52 am
Posts: 1657
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
ottodc6 wrote:
Can we please have that on the 17-50? :roll:


considering the 17-50 non VC seems to be better than the new VC version, maybe you dont want Tamron tinkering with that lens any further. The non VC 17-50 works pretty good as it is.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Carlton
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:16 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 2119
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 1 time
I wouldn't be surprised if this sparks a whole new line of lenses from Tamron. 24-70f2.8 USD VC, 70-200f2.8 USD VC, 14-24f2.8 USD VC, 300f2.8 USD VC etc etc.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
taob
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:07 pm 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 6:33 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Toronto, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
PotatoEYE wrote:
Funny abbreviation they are using :lol:

Yeah, the hold up was probably the marketing department trying to come up with an abbreviation that hasn't already been used. :lol: So now we have USM (Canon), SWM (Nikon), SSM (Minolta/Sony), SDM (Pentax), HSM (Sigma), and USD (Tamron). Anyone else?
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
ottodc6
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:43 pm
Posts: 24
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
pretty good eh, I think the non-vc version will be perfect with USM. VC is the last thing this lens needs. What it needs is a USM so it doesn't scare the crap out of everyone every time I try to focus. :lol:

chopper wrote:
ottodc6 wrote:
Can we please have that on the 17-50? :roll:


considering the 17-50 non VC seems to be better than the new VC version, maybe you dont want Tamron tinkering with that lens any further. The non VC 17-50 works pretty good as it is.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
sabesh
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:56 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Mississauga
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
taob wrote:
Yeah, the hold up was probably the marketing department trying to come up with an abbreviation that hasn't already been used. :lol: So now we have USM (Canon), SWM (Nikon), SSM (Minolta/Sony), SDM (Pentax), HSM (Sigma), and USD (Tamron). Anyone else?

LOL! :lol:
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PotatoEYE
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:50 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
taob wrote:
PotatoEYE wrote:
Funny abbreviation they are using :lol:

Yeah, the hold up was probably the marketing department trying to come up with an abbreviation that hasn't already been used. :lol: So now we have USM (Canon), SWM (Nikon), SSM (Minolta/Sony), SDM (Pentax), HSM (Sigma), and USD (Tamron). Anyone else?


Looks like time well wasted, and they have tragically failed...USD has been used for quite some time in monetary field :D
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Carlton
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:07 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 2119
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 1 time
PotatoEYE wrote:
Looks like time well wasted, and they have tragically failed...USD has been used for quite some time in monetary field :D


Maybe it's a sign of things to come with their new pricing? Maybe someone had too much LSD
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PotatoEYE
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:40 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
Carlton wrote:
PotatoEYE wrote:
Looks like time well wasted, and they have tragically failed...USD has been used for quite some time in monetary field :D


Maybe someone had too much LSD


You can never have too much of it :lol:
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
mikefellh
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:03 am 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:49 am
Posts: 2012
Location: Leaside
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Olympus has SWD (Supersonic Wave Drive), not to be confused with SSWF (Supersonic Wave Filter).

Leica has some really weird names for their lens types, Summilux, Vario-Elmar, Vario-Elmarit??? Now THAT is confusing!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
hotwire
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:52 am
Posts: 4022
Location: Newmarket
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/RJbMu
Sonic motors to not necessarily mean faster focusing. F still equals MA. The benefits of them are typically the DMF (direct manual focus), and the silent factor.

As an example, the Minolta 80-200/2.8 from 1985 (screwdriver), on the right body is known to AF faster than the 70-200/2.8 SSM. The Nikon 50 AF D screwdriver is regarded to be faster focusing than the 50 AF G. The 85L is USM, but still takes a while to move all that glass.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 13 posts ] 

Board index » Photography Forums » Gear and Equipment

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group